Share the QR code < / P > < p > with wechat scanning code to friends and circles of friends < / P > < p > < p > Abstract: in a recent Tesla "brake failure" accident, Tesla rejected the owner's request for complete accident data. Ms. Zhang, who defended the rights of the roof, said that she had asked for complete data four times, but had not received the < / P > < p > < text so far. Guo Huaiyi < / P > < p > since Tesla achieved domestic production, the "brake failure" incident has been concerned by the public and public opinion. Recently, a "brake failure" incident in Nanjing once again raised doubts about Tesla < p > during the communication between the owner and Tesla, the dispute between the two sides still focused on the complete data related to the accident < p > "Tesla is very strong and said it would not provide data because there is no precedent." Tesla owner Ms. Lin told the media after experiencing a "brake failure" < p > it is reported that the accident occurred in March this year. At that time, Ms. Lin drove Tesla Model 3 out of the garage. Without stepping on the accelerator, the vehicle suddenly accelerated. Ms. Lin pressed the brake several times, but the vehicle was out of control. Finally, the vehicle hit the wall < p > after the incident, Tesla said that the cause of the accident was that Ms. Lin drove too fast, the epoxy floor paint caused the ground of the garage to be too slippery, and Ms. Lin only stepped on the brake at the last second before the collision, so the vehicle failed to stop successfully < p > but after Ms. Lin took out video evidence such as dash cam to prove that she had stepped on the brake for many times, Tesla changed to say that Ms. Lin had stepped on the brake twice < p > in order to understand the real cause of "brake failure", Ms. Lin asked Tesla for complete data of the accident or conducted simulation test of restoring the accident scene, but Tesla did not accept it < p > think about it, ma'am, but I don't understand that. Who would have the right to choose a car like that? You won't believe it until you spread it on yourself < p > on the scene of last year's Shanghai auto show, Ms. Tesla, who defended her rights on the roof, also said recently that Tesla has not provided complete data on the accident so far < p > Ms. Zhang told Caijing automobile that she had asked Tesla for complete data of the accident four times, but Tesla refused for various reasons < p > "Tesla didn't give it because the data was complex and I couldn't understand it. I said it would be given to the regulatory authority and let the regulatory authority decide. But Tesla didn't give it either. Their reason was given to the regulatory authority and the regulatory authority couldn't understand it. I felt that my IQ was insulted." "After the State Administration of market supervision asked Tesla to provide data unconditionally, Tesla gave me 30 minutes of driving data during the accident, with 11 parameters. I asked them if the data was complete? Tesla didn't say it was complete." < p > in the subsequent litigation process, Ms. Zhang still hopes to get complete accident data. "I asked them if the data was complete. Tesla's lawyers just said they thought they had provided complete data related to the accident. I also asked why there was no such data as kinetic energy recovery, motor torque speed and brake pedal, which are important data related to braking. They didn't respond." < p > what surprised Ms. Zhang even more was that Tesla had 25 parameters in the data given to an overseas rights protection owner, while its own data had only 11? "I have 14 fewer parameters than him, and I don't have some parameters; I have some parameters, but he doesn't. I think Tesla has selectively provided data rather than complete data." < p > it is worth noting that with the rapid development of automotive intelligent networking this year, the importance of data has been paid more and more attention by all parties < p > in May 2021, the state Internet Information Office issued several regulations on automobile data security management (Draft for comments). Shortly thereafter, Tesla announced the establishment of a data center in China. In response, Tesla said on its official micro-blog that the move was to achieve localization of data storage, and all data generated by vehicles sold in the Chinese mainland market will be stored in the territory. p> < p > < p > since this year, relevant departments have been continuously improving the data management of new energy vehicles. On April 8, the Ministry of industry and information technology and other five departments jointly issued the guiding opinions on Further Strengthening the construction of safety system of new energy vehicle enterprises (hereinafter referred to as the opinions). The opinions particularly emphasizes that enterprises should carry out data collection, storage, use, processing, transmission, provision, disclosure and other processing activities in accordance with the relevant provisions of laws and administrative regulations, as well as data exit safety management < p > in this regard, Tesla told Caijing Auto: "there will be some data in the background, but the complete data of the vehicle is in EDR (automobile event data recording system), which is similar to a black box. Whether it is a case in Henan or later, as long as it is sent for detection, all the data can be taken out, so it is not a problem that Tesla does not provide." < p > in fact, Ms. Zhang previously responded that Tesla appointed an identification agency and told that only this identification agency in China could detect, and that the agency had business dealings with Tesla. So she can't accept testing in this structure
2023-03-22 10:04:52