Using wechat scanning QR code < / P > < p > to share with friends and circles of friends < / P > < p > to get the complete original driving data before the accident has become Ms. Zhang's idea for a year < p > her "integrity" is not limited to time. Previously, under its successive "shelling", Tesla has provided data 30 minutes before the accident, including 9 parameters such as vehicle speed and physical movement signal of brake pedal, and the content of driving data is up to 48 pages < p > "the data provided by Tesla lacks many parameters." Industry voices also believe that the current data are not enough to judge the truth < p > recently, the shell finance reporter of the Beijing News learned that last year, Ms. Zhang submitted materials to the court on the Tesla driving data dispute, which was accepted on March 12 this year, and then filed a case. The cause of the case was the dispute over personal information protection < p > this may be the first case of "new energy vehicle driving data dispute" in China. The dispute over the ownership of vehicle driving data is also an epitome of the contradiction caused by the rapid development of new energy vehicles < p > in the new era of intelligent vehicles, the "old method" of relying on hardware to test whether the vehicle brakes fail has become unworkable, and the software and system monitoring technology need to be improved urgently. "The truth is very important, but the truth is only one aspect". According to experts, the ownership of driving data caused by the Tesla rights protection event is very important < p > now, it is more worth discussing how to implement the data ownership mentioned in laws and regulations, whether there is a supervision and accountability mechanism for corporate behavior, and how the current mechanism can keep up with the new era of rapidly developing intelligent vehicles < p > in early March, there was light rain in Zhengzhou, Henan Province. The gentle wind is rising, the grass is green, and Zhengzhou begins to walk out of the cold winter < p > after waiting for nearly a year, Ms. Zhang received a short message notification that the case was accepted < p > the year before last, the sassy and smooth Tesla was just what Ms. Zhang wanted. She almost didn't hesitate to buy the car and put a diamond like sticker on it. The sun shone < p > by 2021, she had become the center of Tesla's "brake door" storm and carried the label of "Shanghai auto show roof rights protection female owner" < p > after firmly believing that her car had "brake failure" and failed to complain, at the Shanghai auto show in April, Ms. Zhang stepped on the roof of Tesla and shouted "Tesla brake failure", which also launched a "marathon" rights protection - in May, Ms. Zhang filed a reputation infringement lawsuit against Tao Lin, vice president of Tesla. In July, relevant litigation materials were submitted to the people's Court of Beiguan District of Anyang City to file a lawsuit on Tesla driving data and other aspects < p > the reporter of shell finance and economics learned that in December last year, the reputation right case had been publicly tried, and the car data lawsuit was accepted on March 12 this year and then filed < p > "request to order the defendant Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. to provide the plaintiff with complete and true original driving data", Ms. Zhang wrote in the civil complaint presented to the reporter of shell finance that on February 21, 2021, the plaintiff's Tesla car rear ended other vehicles, causing a serious accident. In order to find out the cause of the accident, The plaintiff legally asked the defendant Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. to provide complete and true driving data half an hour before the accident of the vehicle, which the defendant Tesla refused for various reasons < p > "the personal information of a natural person is protected by law. The driving data of the plaintiff's vehicle belongs to the plaintiff's personal information. The plaintiff has the right to consult and copy the plaintiff's complete and true original driving data held by the defendant Tesla. The defendant's behavior seriously infringed on the plaintiff's legitimate rights and interests." The complaint said < p > Ms. Zhang told the reporter of shell finance that she still hasn't got complete driving data so far. It showed reporters that the data 30 minutes before the accident provided by Tesla showed that there were a total of 9 parameters, including vehicle speed, brake pedal physical movement signal, brake master cylinder pressure, ABS signal, accelerator pedal position, steering wheel steering angle, etc < p > however, she believes that Tesla did not provide key data such as brake pedal displacement and motor torque < p > Ms. Zhang said that Tesla also provided data after she learned that a car owner who bought a car in the same 4S store had an accident. After comparison, it is found that the data parameters provided by Tesla to the two car owners are not consistent < p > this makes it believe that Tesla has actually recorded accident related data, so it has the ability and obligation to provide comprehensive data to car owners. Her main appeal is to ask Tesla to provide complete driving data < p > in this regard, on March 22, the reporter of shell finance tried to verify the matter, and Tesla said that there was no response information for the time being < p > the request for driving data is blocked and is being experienced by more people < p > Shanghai Tesla owner Xu Hui (a pseudonym) told shell finance reporters that Tesla said that it must provide certificates from relevant departments to see the driving data < p > according to his account, he drove Tesla Model & nbsp; in September 2021; S returned to Shanghai after his vacation from Nantong. When the roadside was ready to put down his friends and children in the car, the slow-moving vehicle suddenly accelerated automatically and rushed forward at the speed of 100 km / h, and the brakes failed completely. I was forced to drive to the road and hit two cars in a row before stopping < p > the surveillance video provided by Xu Hui to shell financial reporters, model & nbsp; S suddenly accelerates after deceleration, but the reason for acceleration cannot be displayed < p > then Tesla called the police. Tesla then replied that Xu would step on the wrong accelerator pedal, which led to the sudden acceleration of the vehicle. Tesla will not compensate or return the vehicle. Since then, she asked Tesla to provide vehicle driving data to judge or detect the cause of the accident < p > according to the screenshot issued by Xu Hui to the reporter of shell finance, Tesla said that it can provide data, "but it needs the corresponding certificate issued by the public security inspection and law or the regulatory department" and "it is not the accident certificate". After repeated questioning, Tesla did not reply < p > another screenshot provided by Ms. Xu shows that the traffic police in charge of the accident said that the police were unable to issue the above certificate < p > in the process of requesting driving data, some people also reported that the content obtained was insufficient < p > on December 24, 2021, a Tesla fell into the river in Liyang, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province. Two people in the car were injured and died after hospital rescue < p > the family members of the deceased told shell finance that after the accident, Tesla provided some driving data and recorded the driving data of the car between 12:06:57 and 12:16:38 on December 24, 2021 < p > family members believe that the driving data provided by Tesla still lacks key data, such as ABS, brake pedal angle and motor rotation
2023-03-22 10:04:52