提供永久免费的API接口，查看更多API接口，如果您有其他免费API资源，请联系我们，造福人类。

定制开发，免费评估，免费咨询，价格便宜，售后保障，前往开发服务中心或联系开发客服中心

On December 6, according to foreign media reports, electric vehicle manufacturer Tesla has asked the U.S. judge to confirm a recent ruling made by the arbitration institution, that is, to reject the defamation allegations made by Christina balan, a former engineer of the company. Prior to this, Tesla fired balan, who sued the company for defamation < p > < / P > < p > Tesla submitted a request to the San Francisco Federal Court last Thursday, after an arbitrator said in the arbitration result on November 3 that balan's allegations were not true. Balan said that Tesla falsely accused her of illegal and criminal acts in response to media articles about her dismissal in 2017 < p > in March this year, an appeal court in California ruled that balan's defamation claims should be arbitrated by an arbitration institution because they are directly related to her work in Tesla. Tesla asked the court last Thursday to confirm the decision of the arbitration institution, and balan decided to challenge this result. On Friday, balan said in an e-mail that she would seek to have the arbitration institution rescind the arbitration result because of "fraud, corruption, prejudice and blatant disregard for the law" < p > balan has said that in response to Tesla's move, she will submit a motion to revoke the ruling. The engineer also said that if necessary, she would submit the case to the Supreme Court < p > balan began to work for Tesla in 2010. His task is to design the battery pack of model s. In this process, balan has been praised many times for his creative thinking and hard work. But when she had to join the interior team, it was all over. There, balan found that there was a problem with the model s foot pad, which might be involved under the pedal. She suspected that she had a relationship with the supplier < p > in the 2019 lawsuit, balan said that she sent an email to Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, saying that the purchase contract was awarded based on friendship without considering price or quality. Soon after, balan was fired. Immediately, balan accused Tesla of misclassification, demotion, retaliation, improper dismissal and gender discrimination. Tesla lost the arbitration and was ordered to pay more than $320000 in 2017 (excluding legal fees and other fees). Balan received all the compensation < p > however, while the arbitration hearing was still going on, the media reported balan's story. After the article was published, Dave Arnold, then Tesla's public relations director, contacted the media and asked them to publish the facts of Tesla's version. In this version, Tesla accused balan of engaging in personal projects within the company without Tesla's approval, using Tesla's money to win over suppliers, and illegally recording meeting contents < p > in short, Tesla publicly accused balan of misappropriating public funds and asking for kickbacks, which finally prevented her from being employed by any other company. Balan refuted most of the above allegations and only admitted that she had taken minutes of the meetings, but she also attended them at that time. Of course, it is a crime to publish the contents of these meetings, but balan denied that he had disclosed the contents of the relevant meetings. Balan initially hired a lawyer to represent her in the lawsuit, but found that they discussed the deal with Tesla behind her back. The engineer finally decided to defend himself as a professional in the arbitration process. (small) < / P > < p >

2023-03-22 10:04:47