Share the QR code < / P > < p > with wechat scanning code to friends and circles of friends < / P > < p > < / P > < p > on December 3, Apple's recent legal documents show that Apple intends to collect Commission on relevant transactions whether Apple App Store developers use Apple payment system or other payment channels < p > although the appeal of epic v. apple, the developer of the popular game fortress night, is still in progress, apple still needs to continue to implement the ruling. Unless the Ninth Circuit Court of appeals approves a stay of execution order, from December 9, apple must allow app developers to display links to other payment channels in the app < p > in a legal document submitted, apple said that even if users do not use Apple's payment system, they are considering charging commissions for any transactions initiated within the app < p > Apple currently charges 15% to 30% commission for intra app transactions. Users must use Apple payment system to buy almost all digital goods. Apple currently prohibits apps from offering other payment channels beyond Apple's control < p > however, according to the court's ruling, apple must relax the app store policy and allow developers to display other payment channels in the app. However, the ruling did not prohibit apple from charging commissions from related transactions < p > Apple said in the court documents submitted that if the ruling takes effect, apple can fully charge commissions for such transactions conducted by users through other channels. Apple CEO Tim Cook revealed this idea at a court hearing earlier this year < p > Google's app store has announced similar policies. Google said it allowed developers to use other payment systems, but the Google App store plans to charge an 11% commission on related transactions, which is only 4% cheaper than developers using the Google App Store payment system directly < p > David Barnard, an independent application developer, said, "my conclusion from this document submitted by apple is that if the ban takes effect, Apple may charge commissions for any transactions generated in the application, even if they are completed through other channels." < / P > < p > the purpose of Apple's submission of this document to the court is also to postpone the effective time of the ruling order on December 9 as far as possible. Therefore, Apple also stressed that allowing applications to display external payment channels requires a lot of necessary "substantive work". Apple said that in order to enable users to use other channels outside Apple's payment system to buy digital goods and services, and let parents control and restore transactions continue to work, necessary development and deployment are needed. (Chen Chen) < / P > < p >